Three master plans, no clear choice
We saw three models being proposed for redevelopment of Osmania University campus. We ask which is the best model — for biodiversity, heritage, and sports.
‘Retain natural features’
Some of the proposals in the Master Plans ignore existing facilities and natural features such as lakes, said Prof. C. Srinivasulu, a faculty member in the Department of Zoology and a wildlife biologist. He suggested that unnecessary landscaping in these areas should be avoided.
“Planners should consider ground realities and work with on-ground officials to adjust projects so that development remains practical and environmentally responsible,” he told this website in an interview.
He explained that even while constructing facilities such as convention centres, R&D buildings, and academic blocks, biodiversity parks must be integrated into the overall campus plan. It is important to maintain functional green spaces rather than roll out decorative landscaping, he said.
— Harshita Titare
‘Fortify the campus’
When asked which of the three proposed models best preserves the University’s heritage and identity, Prof. C. Kaseem, Principal, Arts College, declined to offer a comparative assessment.
“The decision rests solely with the government,” he said. He did, however, outline two major changes slated for implementation.
The first is the creation of a closed campus by sealing all entry points. The second is the refurbishment of buildings that are six to seven decades old. He argued that redevelopment is not merely an infrastructural upgrade, but a broader effort to enhance student safety, learning outcomes, and overall quality of life on campus.
— Jerusha Shailu
‘PPP is best’
“From a sports perspective, Public–Private Partnership (PPP) model is the best option,” said Prof. K. Deepla from the Department of Physical Education.
“It allows faster development and better maintenance compared to only government funding.” Private participation could also bring in updated technology, specialised training support, and professional management practices that are often missing in purely public systems.
“If the PPP model is implemented, students will get modern equipment, better facilities, and professional coaching,” he said, stressing its long-term benefits for student athletes.
— Srija Dandi
